New Zealand Qualifications Authority
Related links...
Portal links...
Find Education Organisations

What do audit cycles say about the provider?

Three Year Cycle

All of the following statements apply:

  • Previous audit cycle outcome two years or more
  • Few non-compliances, none of which is serious or systemic, identified at this audit
  • Any requirements that are not met at audit have since been fully rectified
  • All goals and objectives are met or exceeded
  • Evidence of highly effective teaching and learning is readily available
  • Robust self-review processes, independent of the Authority's external audit, are implemented, and result in improved educational outcomes
  • Evidence of effective relationships with and support from external stakeholders
  • No formal risk concerns from government agencies and no serious upheld complaints from learners
  • Evidence of organisational stability for more than 2 years

Two Year Cycle

All of the following statements apply:

  • Previous audit cycle outcome one year or more
  • Few non-compliances identified at this audit
  • Any requirements that are not met at audit have since been addressed by an approved action plan
  • No recurrence of any serious non-compliance identified at previous audit
  • Most goals and objectives are met
  • Evidence of effective teaching and learning is readily available
  • Self-review processes are fully implemented
  • Evidence of effective relationships with external stakeholders
  • No formal risk concerns from government agencies and no serious upheld complaints from learners
  • Evidence of organisational stability for at least 2 years

One year cycle

The following statement applies:

  • Any audit outcome that fails to meet all the two or three year criteria, but does not trigger any of the less-than-one year criteria

Less than one year cycle

Introductory

The following statement applies:

  • Any new provider after initial registration is confirmed

Corrective

Any of the following statements apply:

  • Any legislative action taken (under s.236AA, s.258A or s.259A of the Education Act, 1989) since the previous audit
  • Failure to rectify serious non-compliances identified at the previous audit
  • Systemic non-compliances in the quality management of the organisation
  • Recurrent failure to meet educational goals and objectives
  • Some legislative or Authority requirements at serious risk of not being met, as indicated by the final audit report
  • Little evidence to demonstrate full implementation of new systems following approved significant change application

Return to provider page