|
A2009/027 - 1 September 2009Changes to sending optional teacher-selected evidence with external moderationCurrently there are two types of student evidence that is moderated by NZQA moderators:
From September 2009 NZQA is making changes to the current process surrounding optional teacher-selected evidence. Previously, questions could relate to up to four samples of student work, had to relate to the standard selected for moderation and could only be sent on moderation submission dates. This has changed to provide more flexibility for teachers. Changes from September 2009
Benefits to the SchoolPlease encourage your staff to use this process to gain further understanding of making assessment decisions about student work, especially at the grade boundary. This can lead to better results for the school for external moderation. The teachers can develop greater confidence and skill in making assessment decisions. Students can benefit from more consistent grades and better quality feedback. The process could also be used by schools to support their own decisions surrounding internal moderation and appeals made by students about the grades they have been awarded. This opportunity and the Moderation Best Practice Workshops provided by NZQA should be used to support subjects and teachers with relatively poor external moderation patterns. Please remind staff of this opportunity at regular intervals and use it to support improvements in both internal and external moderation processes. If senior management would like to increase the number of samples in a particular subject, they should discuss this with their School Relationship Manager who can arrange further support. Comparison of Random Selection and Teacher Selection
Cover Sheets
Mailing Instructions
Guidance & ClarificationExamples of suitable questions and answers can be found here. Moderators will give guidance and clarification on the questions asked but it is not an opportunity for the moderator to mark the work. As teacher-selected samples will not be marked, moderators will not report on agreement with the grades awarded for these additional samples. Instead, the moderators will give qualitative feedback in the form of explanation, advice and guidance. This feedback will be given separately from the Moderation Report. The teacher(s) who marked the student evidence should give consent for their decisions to be part of the teacher-selected samples and the Head of Department should co-sign on the Cover Sheet to indicate that they support this evidence being used as the priority for their subject and school. AppealsThe appeals process must still be used where the teacher is seeking further clarification of a moderator decision or disagrees with a moderator decision on a Moderation Report. The optional teacher-selected evidence opportunity must not be used as the appeals process. Enquiries A PDF Please refer any enquiries relating to this circular to:
To receive these circulars by email enter your email address below: |
Previous circulars
|
Page updated: 01 September 2009

