- Home
- Studying in New Zealand
- Qualifications and standards
- NCEA
-
Maori and Pasifika
- Field Māori Assessment Support Materials
- Field Māori programme development support
- Mātauranga Māori qualifications and assessment standards
- Te Hono o Te Kahurangi quality assurance
- Māori providers
- Te Kōkiritanga 2020-2023
- NCEA and the Whānau
- Māori and the Future State
- Pasifika
- Ngā Kete Mātauranga
- Enabling Māori and Pacific Success in STEM
-
Providers and partners
- About education organisations
- NZQA's quality assurance system for tertiary education organisations
- Quick links to NZQF documents
- Consistency of graduate outcomes
- Approval, accreditation and registration
- Monitoring and Assessment
- Self-assessment
- External evaluation and review
- Assessment and moderation of standards
- Submitting results and awarding qualifications and micro-credentials
- The Education (Pastoral Care of Domestic Tertiary Students) Interim Code of Practice 2019
- The Education (Pastoral Care of International Students) Code of Practice
- Offshore use of qualifications and programmes
- Guidelines and forms
- Reform of Vocational Education
- About us
Assessment Matters

Consultation on the proposed process for maintaining the approved subjects list for University Entrance
A2017/23 - 11 Sep 2017
To: |
Principal |
Consultation on the proposed process for maintaining the approved subjects list for University Entrance
NZQA is consulting on processes (and criteria) for:
- modification to the list of approved subjects for University Entrance (addition of subjects and standards)
- regular cyclic review of the list of approved subjects for University Entrance (so that the list remains relevant and meets its intended purpose).
The purpose of the approved subjects list for University Entrance is to ensure that students have the appropriate skills and knowledge in a subject to prepare them for degree level study at university.
NZQA‘s review of the University Entrance requirements 2016 – 2017 indicated a process for the regular review and maintenance of the approved subjects list should be considered. Almost 90 percent of survey respondents, and all organisations, agreed or strongly agreed that: “We should have a regular process for the approved subjects list”.
For more information, please see our consultation page.