 Home
 Studying in New Zealand
 Qualifications and standards
 NCEA
 Maori and Pasifika

Providers and partners
 About education organisations
 NZQA's quality assurance system for tertiary education organisations
 Quick links to NZQF documents
 Consistency of graduate outcomes
 Approval, accreditation and registration
 Monitoring and Assessment
 Selfassessment
 External evaluation and review
 Assessment and moderation of standards
 Submitting results and awarding qualifications and microcredentials
 The Education (Pastoral Care of Domestic Tertiary Students) Interim Code of Practice 2019
 The Education (Pastoral Care of International Students) Code of Practice
 Offshore use of qualifications and programmes
 Guidelines and forms
 About us
Assessment Report
Level 2 Mathematics and Statistics 2019
Standards 91261 91262 91267
Part A: Commentary
Candidates who were well prepared over the breadth of the curriculum were rewarded for their efforts and diligence. On the other hand, candidates whose curriculum knowledge was limited to certain domains, or who gave only minimalistic answers, found it difficult to achieve all standards.
Markers also noted that:
 some candidates had learned how to answer particular question types but lacked the overall understanding of the standard’s coverage necessary to succeed
 candidates who had a graphics calculator generally used it effectively – those without one are at a disadvantage.
Part B: Report on standards
91261: Apply algebraic methods in solving problems
Candidates who were awarded Achievement commonly:
 rearranged a quadratic equation, set it to 0, and then solved it correctly, giving both answers
 simplified a rational expression involving roots and powers
 manipulated expressions involving logs correctly
 could add and subtract fractions.
Candidates whose work was assessed as Not Achieved commonly:
 could not manipulate logarithms
 could not rearrange expressions without errors
 could not simplify expressions with fractional and negative powers
 could not add or subtract algebraic fractions
 could not solve a quadratic equation.
Candidates who were awarded Achievement with Merit commonly:
 factorised an expression with multiple unknowns
 set up and solved exponential equations
 used the properties of the discriminant to form a quadratic equation
 could add or subtract algebraic fractions and simplify the final answer
 applied context to a question
 factorised and expanded effectively, especially when negatives were involved.
Candidates who were awarded Achievement with Excellence commonly:
 understood the properties of the discriminant, created an appropriate equation and then solved it correctly
 found the stretch factor for a parabola and used the resultant equation to find a horizontal distance
 communicated a series of statements in a logical manner
 formed, rearranged and solved equations with surds
 formed and solved exponential equations.
Standardspecific comments
It is apparent that many candidates continue to tackle this standard without a graphic calculator. Educational institutions who insist on candidates learning algebra without this tool must understand that their students will be disadvantaged.
The manipulation of logarithms was clarified in the latest version of the Teaching and Learning Guide. Many candidates showed weakness in this area and were not able to successfully apply the basic laws of logarithms.
Where questions were ‘different’ from past papers (e.g. Q3(c)), candidates generally struggled to apply appropriate algebraic techniques. Candidates would be better prepared if they were exposed to a wider range of questions than just those commonly found in past papers. In this way students can develop the ability to apply algebraic skills in a wide variety of contexts.
91262: Apply calculus methods in solving problems
Candidates who were awarded Achievement commonly:
 differentiated correctly and substituted correct values into the new function
 integrated a given function and substituted in given values
 formed appropriate equations for a contextual situation and took the derivative
 differentiated a polynomial to form a derived equation with an inequality to represent when a function is increasing
 sketched the gradient function of a cubic graph, accurately showing some key features
 sketched the function from a gradient function showing key features
 found the rate of change for a given equation
 differentiated and antidifferentiated kinematics equations.
Candidates whose work was assessed as Not Achieved commonly:
 did not attempt sufficient questions
 did not differentiate or integrate correctly, particularly when dealing with polynomials which included nonnumeric coefficients
 were unable to form a suitable equation to model the contextual situation from which calculus was then to be applied
 forgot to include the constant of integration
 did not know the differences between the graph of a function and the graph of a gradient function or did not precisely show all the relevant features when drawing graphs
 did not use calculus to solve the kinematics questions.
Candidates who were awarded Achievement with Merit commonly:
 showed relational thinking in order to correctly solve a problem using calculus techniques by interpreting the given information and used multiple steps
 clearly communicated their answers in context
 differentiated to determine the rate of change for a situation presented and solved the problem
 were able to use antidifferentiation to solve kinematic problems
 drew accurate graphs for a given function accurately showing all the key features.
Candidates who were awarded Achievement with Excellence commonly:
 showed clear and concise working with sound justification when applying calculus methods to answer a question
 applied coordinate geometry and algebra skills together with calculus knowledge and skills to solve a complex problem
 formed a model for a given situation and methodically applied calculus techniques to solve the problem with justification
 clearly communicated the answer in context.
Standardspecific comments
Many candidates demonstrated a high level of competence in calculus and communicated their answers clearly, with well setout working.
Candidates who had a graphics calculator used it effectively – those without one are at a disadvantage.
Many students tried to do questions using coordinate geometry or physics skills ONLY and did not employ calculus techniques – candidates must apply calculus in solving problems for this standard.
Sufficient working needs to be shown if candidates wish to obtain more than an achieved grade.
Some careless numerical errors were ignored if this resulted in a minor error that did not affect the level of difficulty of the problem, but this often limited further progress towards an answer.
Candidates need to use correct notation and/or mathematical conventions to ensure their knowledge and understanding can be clearly identified and rewarded. They must also be prepared to justify their answers using calculus techniques.
91267: Apply probability methods in solving problems
Candidates who were awarded Achievement commonly:
 evaluated simple probabilities from a table of data
 evaluated simple probabilities using the normal distribution
 evaluated simple probabilities of combined events, having set up an appropriate tree diagram.
Candidates whose work was assessed as Not Achieved commonly:
 were not able to collate appropriate figures for probabilities from the table provided.
 were not able to interpret the correct values, from normal distribution tables, to calculate probabilities.
 were not able to set up and use a probability tree to provide simple probabilities of combined events
 were unable to calculate simple probabilities
 were able to use neither a graphics calculator nor tables to find probabilities for the normal distribution.
 did not understand that probability must be less than or equal to 1
 were unable to answer the achieved questions in all three areas of the standard, answering questions from two out of three areas only.
Candidates who were awarded Achievement with Merit commonly:
 were able to calculate appropriate relative risk probabilities
 were able to describe the shape of a distribution and compare it with a normal distribution
 were able to calculate and interpret the standard deviation for a normal distribution
 could relate the key ideas of normal distributions, e.g. shape and standard deviation, to the context
 could correctly calculate relative risk in context
 could use probabilities to critically analyse a claim.
Candidates who were awarded Achievement with Excellence commonly:
 used the standard normal distribution to solve problems
 drew more complex probability trees and used them successfully to find a probability
 were able to link key descriptors of a normal distribution to a context with consideration of the subtle features of that context
 generalised probabilities in a given context
 correctly calculated and interpreted relative risk and evaluated a claim, showing insight and perception and considering wider issues connected with the data.
Standardspecific comments
There are many candidates who are still using normal distribution probability tables. This makes many aspects of this examination more challenging. On the other hand, written responses to questions were often completed well, with clear expression of the ideas that the candidate wanted to convey.
Mathematics and Statistics subject page
Previous years' reports