- Home
- Studying in New Zealand
- Qualifications and standards
- NCEA
-
Maori and Pasifika
- Field Māori Assessment Support Materials
- Field Māori programme development support
- Mātauranga Māori qualifications and assessment standards
- Te Hono o Te Kahurangi quality assurance
- Māori providers
- Te Kōkiritanga 2020-2023
- NCEA and the Whānau
- Māori and the Future State
- Pasifika
- Ngā Kete Mātauranga
- Enabling Māori and Pacific Success in STEM
-
Providers and partners
- About education organisations
- NZQA's quality assurance system for tertiary education organisations
- Quick links to NZQF documents
- Consistency of graduate outcomes
- Approval, accreditation and registration
- Monitoring and Assessment
- Self-assessment
- External evaluation and review
- Assessment and moderation of standards
- Submitting results and awarding qualifications and micro-credentials
- The Education (Pastoral Care of Domestic Tertiary Students) Interim Code of Practice 2019
- The Education (Pastoral Care of International Students) Code of Practice
- Offshore use of qualifications and programmes
- Guidelines and forms
- Reform of Vocational Education
- About us
Assessment Report
Level 2 Lea Faka-Tonga 2019
Standards 91674 91677
Part A: Commentary
Candidates at this level had a sound knowledge of the Tongan language at Level 7 of the New Zealand Curriculum.
Candidates who achieved Excellence and Merit level wrote thoughtful answers that included solid and relevant evidence from the texts.
Candidates are reminded to ensure their answers are based on information from the texts, rather than prior knowledge and personal opinion.
Part B: Report on standards
91674: Demonstrate understanding of a variety of spoken Lea Faka-Tonga texts on familiar matters
Candidates who were awarded Achievement commonly:
- provided some relevant, simple details from the listening texts
- used information from the listening notes pages
- wrote short, simplistic answers that conveyed the general meaning
- demonstrated basic knowledge of Level 7 vocabulary and structures.
Candidates whose work was assessed as Not Achieved commonly:
- did not attempt all questions
- made incorrect inferences
- showed insufficient understanding of the listening passages
- struggled with the length and complexity of the spoken texts.
Candidates who were awarded Achievement with Merit commonly:
- planned their answers using the listening notes pages
- included most of the relevant details to support their points
- communicated most of the meaning unambiguously
- showed clear understanding of the listening passages by rewording ideas clearly.
Candidates who were awarded Achievement with Excellence commonly:
- showed thorough understanding of the texts by writing full responses that included inferred meaning from complex parts of the texts
- justified answers using a range of details from the listening texts
- understood and explained answers using fluid language.
91677: Demonstrate understanding of a variety of written and/or visual Lea Faka-Tonga texts on familiar matters
Candidates who were awarded Achievement commonly:
- provided information that was mostly correct, although sometimes the responses lacked clarity
- understood the general meaning of the texts, picking up simple information
- provided responses that lacked depth, development and the detailed information needed to reach a higher level
- made some reference to the texts when giving opinions.
Candidates whose work was assessed as Not Achieved commonly:
- did not attempt all questions
- provided little information
- provided irrelevant responses.
Candidates who were awarded Achievement with Merit commonly:
- identified the key ideas
- linked relevant ideas from the texts
- understood more complex sentences and language features at Level 7
- connected ideas appropriately
- offered opinions that clearly referred to information from the texts.
Candidates who were awarded Achievement with Excellence commonly:
- provided clear and accurate responses, showing thorough understanding of the texts
- justified their ideas, which were supported by relevant details from the texts
- demonstrated comprehensive understanding of the texts by writing full answers with most or all details correct
- were able to demonstrate understanding of the more complex language features and structures at Level 7.
Previous years' reports
2018 (PDF, 103KB) 2017 (PDF, 40KB) 2016 (PDF, 206KB)