- Home
- Qualifications and standards
- NCEA
- Māori and Pasifika
-
Providers and partners
- About education organisations
- NZQA's quality assurance system for tertiary education organisations
- Guidelines and forms
- Consistency of graduate outcomes
- Approval, accreditation and registration
- Monitoring and Assessment
- Self-assessment
- External evaluation and review
- Assessment and moderation of standards
- Submitting results and awarding qualifications and micro-credentials
- Tertiary and International Learners Code of Practice
- Offshore use of qualifications and programmes
- Reform of vocational education
- International Education planning
- international
- About us
Visual arts - external exemplars level 2 2016 - photography
Show: External Exemplars
The resources below contain examples of candidate work submitted in 2016 for verification of assessment for the Visual Arts Achievement Standard 91322 Produce a systematic body of work that shows understanding of art making conventions and ideas within photography. The purpose of this resource is to assist art teachers prepare their teaching programmes and their students for assessment.
Excellence | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
These portfolios have been verified as within the Excellence grade range. These portfolios present evidence that meet the criteria consistent with The New Zealand Curriculum, Learning Media, Ministry of Education, 2007. Criteria relate to the following strands in Visual Arts, Level: 6 Understanding the Arts in Context; Developing Practical Knowledge; Developing Ideas; Communicating and Interpreting. These candidates have shown the ability to:
|
|||||||||
Student 1This portfolio has been verified as placed in the high range of the Excellence grade range as it clearly fulfils the criteria for Excellence:
|
|
||||||||
Student 2This portfolio has presented sufficient evidence to achieve Excellence but would be placed more securely in the grade range if:
|
|
||||||||
Merit | |||||||||
These portfolios have been verified as within the Merit grade range. These candidates have shown the ability to:
|
|||||||||
Student 3This portfolio is approaching Excellence as it shows some evidence of:
To be awarded Excellence it would need more evidence of:
|
|
||||||||
Student 4This portfolio has been verified as placed in the middle of the Merit grade range as it clearly fulfils the criteria for Merit:
|
|
||||||||
Student 5This portfolio has present sufficient evidence to achieve Merit but would be placed more securely in the grade range if:
|
|
||||||||
Achievement | |||||||||
These portfolios have been verified as within the Achieved grade range. These candidates have shown the ability to:
|
|||||||||
Student 6This portfolio is approaching Merit level performance as it shows some evidence of:
As a narrative/documentary submission it drops off at the bottom of Board 2 which limits the opportunity to provide a clear extension of ideas. To be awarded Merit it would need more evidence of:
|
|
||||||||
Student 7This portfolio has been verified as placed in the middle of the Achieved grade range as it clearly fulfils the criteria for Achievement:
|
|
||||||||
Student 8This portfolio has presented sufficient evidence to Achieve but would be placed more securely in the Achieved grade range if:
|
|