Field          Multifield

 

Revision of Agricultural and Horticultural Science, Drama Studies, English, and Geography achievement standards - multi-level.

 

Revised achievement standards

 

Domain

ID

Subject reference

Agricultural and Horticultural Science

91294

2.6

91530

3.3

Drama Studies

91215

2.3

91514

3.3

English Visual Language

90850

1.2

English Oral Language

91099

2.2

Geography

91242

2.3

 

New Registration date                                                                        November 2017

 

Date new versions published                                                          November 2017

 

Planned review date                                                                           December 2019

 

Main changes resulting from Revision of Achievement Standards

 

The changes to these achievement standards have been discussed and agreed to jointly by the Ministry of Education and NZQA in the Review of Achievement Standards group.

 

Subject Ref

ID

Int/Ext

Change and reasons for change

Ag/Ht 2.6

91294

Ext

New Explanatory Note (EN) 3.  This defines livestock in a broad way so that agribusiness contexts can be used for assessment.

Ag/Ht 3.3

91530

Ext

Amendment to EN 3 replacing “agricultural or horticultural” with “primary industry”, so that agribusiness contexts can be used for assessment.

Drama 3.3

91514

Ext

Amendment to EN 4 by removing “purpose”, for clarification, so that purpose is distinct from “features”.

Drama 2.3

91215

Ext

Amendment to EN 3 by removing “purpose”, for clarification, so that purpose is distinct from “features”.

English 1.2

90850

Ext

Amendment to EN 8 by adding an extra bullet “digital/online text”, to add a further option for text type.

English 2.2

91099

Ext

Amendment to EN 6 by adding an extra bullet “digital/online text”, to add a further option for text type.

Geography 2.3

91242

Ext

Amendment EN 3 by replacing “and” with “and/or”.  This allows for case studies where the factors are mainly cultural or natural.  The “and” proved to be too restrictive.