- Home
- Qualifications and standards
- NCEA
-
Māori and Pasifika
- Field Māori Assessment Support Material
- Field Māori programme development support
- Mātauranga Māori qualifications and assessment standards
- Te Hono o Te Kahurangi quality assurance
- Māori providers
- Te Kōkiritanga 2020-2023
- Māori and the Future State
- Pasifika
- Ngā Kete Mātauranga
- Equity in STEM Symposium
-
Providers and partners
- About education organisations
- NZQA's quality assurance system for tertiary education organisations
- Guidelines and forms
- Consistency of graduate outcomes
- Approval, accreditation and registration
- Monitoring and Assessment
- Self-assessment
- External evaluation and review
- Assessment and moderation of standards
- Submitting results and awarding qualifications and micro-credentials
- Tertiary and International Learners Code of Practice
- Offshore use of qualifications and programmes
- Reform of Vocational Education
- International Education planning
- Rules Consultation
- international
- About us
Meeting programme approval and accreditation criteria
The process that tertiary education organisations must follow to meet the criteria for programme approval or accreditation is linked to external evaluation and review (EER) results. NZQA has a policy of incentives and sanctions following EER that aim to improve educational quality and performance by providing incentives for high performance.
The process and templates for submitting applications to NZQA can be found under Applications for programme approval and provider accreditation. Organisations making applications are strongly encouraged to familiarise themselves with the Guidelines for programme approval and provider accreditation at levels 1-6 on the NZQF.
All non-university tertiary education providers are placed into one of four provider categories based on their external evaluation and review (EER) results. See Provider categories following EER for more details.
The information required in applications for programme approval and accreditation is tailored to take into account the provider category.
The minimum information required from all providers is:
- evidence of academic quality assurance approval e.g. Minutes of Academic Board approval from wānanga and Te Pūkenga or for smaller PTEs detailed records of programme approval by appropriately designated people in the organisation’s quality management system
- agreement to participate in the external consistency processes specified as part of the qualification.
The information needed to support the application is determined by the provider category. See the sections below for more information.
Category 1 Providers
- Where the tertiary education organisation can demonstrate a successful history of delivery in the subject area and at the level, full programme details need to be submitted to meet NZQA criteria requirements.
- For delivery in a new area, or at a level above current approvals and accreditations held in the area, then the application requires full programme details to be submitted to meet NZQA criteria requirements, and a self-assessment report of the application for programme approval using the key evaluation questions.
Category 2 Providers
- Full programme details need to be submitted to meet NZQA criteria requirements, and a self-assessment report of the application for programme approval using the key evaluation questions.
Category 3 Providers
Applications for programme approval and/or provider accreditation will be considered on a case by case basis according to:
- any quality concerns in the EER report relate to the subject area, school or faculty where the accreditation or consent to assess is being applied for
- the educational organisation immediately engages with NZQA subsequent to the EER and demonstrates it is meeting post-EER improvement action plan requirements within the required timeframes
- any compliance investigations indicate quality concerns are warranted and/or widespread.
Applications must include the full programme details needed to meet NZQA criteria requirements, and a self-assessment report of the application for programme approval using the key evaluation questions.
Category 4 Providers
No new applications can be made.
- New applications for programme approval and/or accreditation are suspended until quality improvements are demonstrated through the satisfactory completion of the post-external evaluation and review action plan.
No assigned category
Educational organisations that have not has an EER and have not been assigned a category may apply as a Category 2 provider.
Meeting the requirements for programme approval
Educational organisations applying for programme approval need to meet the gazetted criteria.
The Guidelines go through each of the criteria for programme approval and provide guidance on the information and/or evidence that must be included in the application to enable the decision for approval to be made.
NZQA recommends programme owners discuss their proposed programme with the qualification developer to ensure it meets the requirements for managing consistency of graduate outcomes.
Meeting the criteria for accreditation to deliver an approved programme
Educational organisations applying for programme accreditation need to meet the gazetted criteria.
The Guidelines go through each of the criteria for programme accreditation and provide guidance on the information and/or evidence that must be included in the application to enable the decision for accreditation to be granted.
Self-assessment of an application
The self-assessment report should address the key evaluation questions, outlined in the Guidelines:
Approval
How well does the programme design match the qualification outcomes and strategic purpose?
Accreditation
To what extent does the education provider have the ongoing capability and resources to support sustained delivery of the approved programme?
NZQA evaluator will be assessing applications using an evaluative approach based on these questions.
For more information refer to the Guidelines or contact the Client Services team at NZQA.