Information for Principal’s Nominees

Derived grade handbook and self-review tool

Information for schools and Principal's Nominees (PDF, 425KB)

Self-review tool for derived and emergency grade processes (DOCX, 25KB)

Application deadlines

The school must process derived grade applications (DOC, 250KB) online on behalf of candidates.

Follow the instructions for making online applications through your high security login from 15 October.

The online application tool closes for all derived grade applications 5 pm on 6 December 20192019 examination timetable

Applications for national representation require a derived grade pre-approval application form (DOCX, 81KB) to be submitted to NZQA by 1 November. If pre-approval is granted, an online application must still be completed.

Remember also:

  • The school must be confident that any grade submitted has been checked for consistency against the criteria of the registered standard and is quality assured. 
  • Do not apply online for the MCAT examination, Visual Arts Levels 1 & 2 or Verified Languages as these are managed under your missed and late assessment policy.
  • For an unexpected event such as a local emergency or group trauma such as the sudden death of a student, contact your SRM for advice.

Evidence retention

  • Retain all completed derived grade application forms and supporting documents until applications open next year as evidence for your own review, or in case of an audit by NZQA.
  • Retain any communication from a distance learning provider that records the derived grade(s) for which they have responsibility.
  • In unexpected circumstances, late applications may be considered by NZQA prior to results being released in January. This is a manual process so contact your SRM for advice.

For further information about when a derived grade may be applied for, see the NZQA derived grade guidelines.

What is an unexpected event grade? (previously called emergency grades)

After an exceptional event beyond the control of students, which stops them from attending an examination, impairs their performance in an examination or prevents them completing an examination NZQA may invoke the unexpected event  process. It can be applied to an individual student or to a whole group of candidates who are all affected in the same way.  Unlike a derived grade, there is no application form for an individual student to complete.

So, for example, after an earthquake in their area a school will have to be checked for safety, and exam sessions may be cancelled until it is declared safe. In such a case, all candidates at the school would be treated in the same way and considered for unexpected event grades.

School quality assurance processes 

Schools must use processes and evidence for derived grades that assure NZQA that the reported grade is based on pre-existing, valid, standard-specific evidence which meets the requirements of the standard.

Quality assurance – assessment tool

Examples of processes that could give the school confidence that the assessment tool used was fit for purpose.

  1. The evidence used is from a practice exam that, for example, had been:
    • developed “in-house” and critiqued in the same way that internal assessments are critiqued (e.g. it could be a practice exam based on modified papers from previous years); or
    • purchased from a secure source such as the subject association and checked against the achievement criteria of the standard; or
    • purchased from a commercial source and checked against the achievement criteria of the standard; or
    • provided by a colleague in another school and critiqued in the same way that internal assessments are critiqued; or
    • an on-line practice exam developed by NZQA or by NZQA in conjunction with another provider.
  2. The evidence used is from an assignment or an end-of-topic test that was:
    • developed with similar rigour as any of the examples above; and
    • there is certainty that the student’s work was their own.

Quality assurance – assessment judgement

The following quality assurance processes could give the school confidence that the derived grade was justifiable and based on valid, standard-specific evidence.

  • Another subject-expert (i.e. “second pair of eyes”) had been involved in the marking, for example, through:
    • the use of panel-marking
    • a sample of grade boundaries from marked examination papers having been checked by a colleague.
  •  Alternatively, the derived grade is justifiable. For example through:
    • external moderation agreement rates that provide confidence in teacher judgements
    • teacher involvement with external examination writing or marking for this standard or subject, which could provide confidence in teacher judgements
    • middle or senior management consulting the teacher on their use of assessment schedules, NZQA exemplars and past student answer booklets that were used as benchmarks, to provide confidence in teacher judgements
    • comparison of previous years’ practice examination grades with NZQA external examination grades achieved for those same years, to provide confidence in the consistency and accuracy of the teacher’s judgements.

The alternatives are particularly useful where a “second pair of eyes” is not readily available. 

Skip to main page content Accessibility page with list of access keys Home Page Site Map Contact Us