- Home
- Qualifications and standards
- NCEA
- Māori and Pasifika
-
Providers and partners
- About education organisations
- NZQA's quality assurance system for tertiary education organisations
- Guidelines and forms
- Consistency of graduate outcomes
- Approval, accreditation and registration
- Monitoring and Assessment
- Self-assessment
- External evaluation and review
- Assessment and moderation of standards
- Submitting results and awarding qualifications and micro-credentials
- Tertiary and International Learners Code of Practice
- Offshore use of qualifications and programmes
- Reform of vocational education
- International Education planning
- international
- About us
Criteria for inclusion of a subject
Criteria for a subject to be included in New Zealand Scholarship
The following provides the criteria to be used in assessing the suitability of a subject to be included on the New Zealand Scholarship subjects list. The criteria will determine whether a current or proposed subject has the capacity to permit students to exhibit the high-level cognitive abilities required to maintain the credibility of the New Zealand Scholarship awards. Any deletions to the current list of subjects for New Zealand Scholarship will need to be carefully considered before recommendations are made.
In making its decisions, the NZQA Board will be looking for evidence of the subjects’ suitability to be included on the subjects list for New Zealand Scholarship.
The criteria for a subject to be included in New Zealand Scholarship are as follows:
1. Curriculum or government goals
A. the range of Scholarship subjects build on and relate to level 3 achievement standards and are derived from level 8 of the New Zealand Curriculum or the equivalent where a national curriculum does not exist
B. Scholarship subjects recognise two of New Zealand’s official languages (te reo Māori and English; with sign language being the third)
C. Scholarship subjects meet government goals about the future direction of the country
2. Subject maturity
A. significant numbers of candidates have shown the ability to perform with excellence at level 3
B. there are writers and markers available of sufficient calibre and experience in this subject to produce quality assessment for students at the appropriate level
C. there is an appropriate tertiary path for Scholarship students in this subject
D. the subject has the capacity to permit students to exhibit the high-level cognitive abilities for the credibility of the Scholarship examinations
3. Practical aspects
A. sufficient candidates to make the most efficient and effective use of resources
B. the proposed mode of assessment is logistically manageable, and
C. running the external assessment is possible within the agreed cost parameters.