- Home
- Qualifications and standards
- NCEA
-
Māori and Pasifika
- Field Māori Assessment Support Materials
- Field Māori programme development support
- Mātauranga Māori qualifications and assessment standards
- Te Hono o Te Kahurangi quality assurance
- Māori providers
- Te Kōkiritanga 2020-2023
- Māori and the Future State
- Pasifika
- Ngā Kete Mātauranga
- Equity in STEM Symposium
-
Providers and partners
- About education organisations
- NZQA's quality assurance system for tertiary education organisations
- Guidelines and forms
- Consistency of graduate outcomes
- Approval, accreditation and registration
- Monitoring and Assessment
- Self-assessment
- External evaluation and review
- Assessment and moderation of standards
- Submitting results and awarding qualifications and micro-credentials
- Tertiary and International Learners Code of Practice
- Offshore use of qualifications and programmes
- Reform of Vocational Education
- International Education planning
- International
- About us
Assessment Report
New Zealand Scholarship
Te Reo Māori 2020
Standard 93003
Part A: Commentary
If candidates are not exposed to this type of language (that of Panekiretanga graduates and different tribal dialects), it is difficult to achieve Scholarship.
Part B: Report on performance standard
Candidates who were awarded Scholarship with Outstanding Performance commonly:
- confidently articulated their thoughts by critically formulating an opinion, integrating statements of ideas within a Māori world view. Sections within the exam portrayed evidence of competency and confidence in reading comprehension, and in transformation of written knowledge into the production of a speech
- demonstrated fluency of Te Reo Māori in their speech. The quality of the language flowed clearly with precision and intent to argue their point, using evidence to support their thinking
- seamlessly made connections between the ideas presented throughout all sections of the exam.
Candidates who were awarded Scholarship commonly:
- had the ability to interpret responses and were able to make connections across different sections of the exam. However, they sometimes lacked in-depth knowledge and understanding of ideas, or were unable to articulate and critically analyse those ideas in their own words.
Candidates who were not awarded Scholarship commonly:
- did not clearly articulate their ideas
- did not make connections across the different sections of the exam
- did not provide original or supporting ideas or evidence
- left sections of the exam blank
- did not fulfil all requirements in some of the questions (e.g. writing more than 500 words in the essay, or describing the use of kīwaha in the oral component).
Subject page
Previous years' reports
2019 (PDF, 160KB), 2018 (PDF, 94KB), 2017 (PDF, 39KB), 2016 (PDF, 180KB)